Clear sources. Clear responsibility.

Our editorial
approach.

Useful information should be easy to understand, check and put into context.

What we publish

Our blog combines practical explanations of the website, everyday planning ideas and source-led Muslim news. A guide and a news report serve different purposes, so we label them separately. Our App and future prayer-clock product remain in development; articles do not imply that they are available to buy or download.

Sources and verification

News summaries link to the original announcement or clearly identified reporting. We distinguish an organisation’s statement from independently established facts, and a proposal from a completed project. Source dates and event dates are recorded separately from the date we publish.

Technical guides are checked against the calculation engine and the features currently available on the website. Personal religious questions and differences in practice require appropriate guidance; we do not claim an independent scholar has reviewed an article unless a real review is credited.

AI assistance and authorship

The launch edition is prepared with AI assistance. We use that assistance for drafting and organisation, then check technical descriptions against the implementation and news against the linked sources. We do not invent people, interviews, expert credentials or religious review badges. Brand-authored pieces are attributed to AL-Naqawa Editorial.

About AL-Naqawa Editorial →

Dates, updates and corrections

Published means the first publication of this article on AL-Naqawa. Updated records a substantive change, not a routine website build. Older guides whose original byline date cannot be verified show an update date instead of an invented publication date.

We retain the original article address when adding a correction or an important follow-up. A visible note explains substantive corrections. Event listings may change after our source check, so readers should consult the organiser before making plans.

Images and illustrations

When a suitable photograph is unavailable, we may use a photorealistic AI-generated scene related to Muslim culture or everyday community life. We label it “AI-generated image · not an event photograph” on the article and its cards. These scenes do not document the reported event, identify its participants or provide evidence for the story.

Our lifestyle images are illustrative scenes. For news, we prefer relevant photographs with a verified basis for reuse. Credits below each photograph identify the photographer, original source, licence and changes. A historical object or venue photograph is labelled as context, with its capture date, rather than presented as a photograph of the reported event. The licence linked in a photo credit applies to that image, including our resized version.

When a suitable photograph cannot be used, we may publish a clearly labelled editorial illustration. We do not use generated imagery to imply that an event was witnessed. A source link alone does not give us permission to republish a photograph.

Tell us about an error

Use the contact form with the article address, the information you believe is incorrect and a reliable supporting source. We use these reports to review content; submitting a message does not send it to other readers.

Report a correction →

Follow the content

The RSS feeds provide published articles and news summaries. They are available without signing in; subscribing through an RSS reader does not subscribe you to email.